The “vaccine that didn’t work”: manufacturer withdraws vaccine from circulation

The “vaccine that didn’t work”: manufacturer withdraws vaccine from circulation
Descriptive text here
-

From the point of view of public healthto the vaccines to mitigate the effects of coronavirus were a success. The disease receded and the world returned to normal. Only those who have suffered serious consequences remain far from normality, a minority that can no longer be ignored, as became clear with the decision of the AstraZeneca to definitively remove your vaccine from circulation.

When it was announced, pioneeringly, in April 2021, the vaccine developed based on research by University of Oxford on top of another virus from the same family, it was received as nothing less than the miracle the world desperately needed.

In retrospect, Vazvevria, its official name, appears not to have fared so well. In Great Britain, 51 families are seeking redress in court for serious injuries and death. It is a tiny number compared to the 100 million doses administered, but it cannot be treated as invisible.

Because of these processes, in February the Anglo-Swedish laboratory admitted in official documents that, in rare cases, the vaccine causes thrombosis syndrome with thrombocytopenia, a catastrophic drop in the number of platelets in the blood. The drop in platelets, which help the blood to clot, and the formation of clots can have lethal effects. In rare cases, the immune system itself mistakes platelets that enter the blood system for viruses and attacks them. Antibodies form a kind of shield around platelets, treated as enemies, triggering clots that move dangerously throughout the body.

This syndrome was linked to the deaths of 81 people in the United Kingdom, in addition to hundreds of cases of serious sequelae. The highest numbers of cases were in people aged 40 to 59.

The laboratory that has now removed the vaccine from circulation says that it saved 6.5 million lives and that its withdrawal from the market is for commercial reasons, unrelated to the process currently underway in the Supreme Court.

Continues after advertising

SIDE EFFECTS

Everyone knows that vaccination against covid it went through a process of extreme political polarization and many people who suffered consequences or lost family members felt intimidated, as if the simple fact of talking about what they were suffering was proof that they were in the anti-vaccination movement.

It is, of course, absurd. Only recently did the New York Times published a report on the subject, stating the obvious: “Even the best vaccines produce rare, but serious, side effects. And covid vaccines were given to 270 million people in the United States, in almost 677 million doses.”

In total, there were 13 thousand requests for compensation in court, of which only 19% progressed in the process. A measly 47 were recognized as deserving of compensation, with twelve having already been compensated for an average of $3,600 – laughable given the portentous figures from the US compensation industry.

“At least there was recognition,” he told the Teams immunologist Akiko Iwasaki. For the Yale researcher, people with consequences attributed to vaccination are often simply ignored. O Teams He spoke over the course of a year with thirty people who suffered neurological, autoimmune or cardiovascular consequences. They all said they had heard from doctors that their symptoms were psychosomatic.

Suffering from an illness that is not recognized – or validated – by medicine greatly increases the burden on its sufferers.

Continues after advertising

BIOLOGICAL DISASTER

Covid vaccines were researched in a regime of enormous global emergency and produced the results that we can all see. But there is no absolute guarantee for any vaccine. Even vaccines considered commonplace can cause neurological diseases such as Bell’s palsy, which affects the muscles of the face, and the terrible Guillain-Barré syndrome.

The most serious case of sequelae occurred in 1955, in the climate of commotion and mobilization in the United States to prevent polio. It was actually a pharmacist error Cutter Laboratories: instead of the inactive virus, used in the immunizer developed by Jonas Salk, a large batch inoculated children with the live virus.

Of the 120,000 children vaccinated with the defective vaccine, 40,000 had a type of polio, with less serious consequences. But 51 were paralyzed and five died in what has been called one of the worst biological disasters in American history.

The AstraZeneca vaccine against Covid is “classic”, made with inactive chimpanzee viruses, without interfering with the genetic mechanisms of cells such as those from Pfizer and Moderna, considered more efficient and adaptable to variants. Supporters of the anti-vaccination movement are already asking for these immunizers to also be withdrawn.

Due to an agreement made with AstraZeneca, similar to those with other laboratories, possible compensations are covered by government funds.

Continues after advertising

Many things are not clear and crystalline in the great battle that humanity wages against the invisible agents of chaos that cause viral diseases. They try to cover up the cases in which vaccines cause serious consequences instead of helping, creating an aura of secrecy that does not help to clarify the great good they can do, with exceptions to be recognized.

The article is in Portuguese

Tags: vaccine didnt work manufacturer withdraws vaccine circulation

-

-

PREV Covid: why AstraZeneca decided to ‘retire’ its vaccine
NEXT The “vaccine that didn’t work”: manufacturer withdraws vaccine from circulation
-

-

-